Gender neutral passport campaigner takes UK government to court

Christie Elan-Cane has argued the UK’s current passport process is “unacceptable,” and breaches international human rights law. They are pushing the Home Office to allow an “X” gender option, alongside male and female.

Elan-Cane’s original legal challenge was rejected last year by London’s High Court, but their appeal is being heard on Tuesday.
A handful of countries, including Germany, Australia and Canada, already offer a third option, other than male or female, on their passports.

Elan-Cane argues that the government’s current policy breaks the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) because it breaches the right to respect for private life and the right not to be discriminated against on the basis of gender or sex.

Germany's third gender law is celebrated as a revolution. But some say it's just the first step
“Legitimate identity is a fundamental human right, but non-gendered people are treated as though we have no rights,” Elan-Cane said in a statement ahead of the case.

“It is unacceptable that someone who defines as neither male nor female is forced to declare an inappropriate gender in order to obtain a passport,” Elan-Cane added.

“X” is accepted as a gender entry on machine-readable travel documents, alongside “M” and “F,” under standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization.

But the British government has resisted calls from activists to change its processes.

A government lawyer argued that the current policy is needed to maintain an “administratively coherent system,” to maintain security at national borders and to combat identity theft.


Please follow article at original source CNN top news

What do you think?

Written by admin


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





Polar bear spray-painted with ‘T-34’ baffles Russia wildlife experts

Chelsea transfer ban: Manager Frank Lampard says he expects to be told “very soon” if the club’s ba…